north-carolina Chapter logo
Home

Don’t protect expensive, dirty coal

A lengthy bill dealing with data centers and energy policy is moving at the North Carolina General Assembly. Section 10 of the bill prohibits the retirement of expensive coal plants until state regulators give a green light to new nuclear energy facilities. That means more years relying on costly, dirty fuel, when we could be transitioning to renewable energy sources that are cheaper to run, faster to build, and better for the environment. 

Use our form to tell lawmakers: Drop Section 10 from Senate Bill 730.

The best way to protect rate payers is by retiring expensive coal plants and building cheaper generation, especially those without fuel costs, such as solar and batteries. Burning coal in aging plants has become one of the most expensive ways to generate electricity, even before counting the significant environmental costs. Coal costs have risen in recent years, and Duke Energy’s customers, not shareholders, are on the hook for it.

We don’t need to extend the lives of coal plants beyond Duke Energy’s current retirement schedule, and we certainly don’t need a law that dictates it.

11

signatures of 200 goal

Continue
Your Message


Hand drawn downward pointing arrow
Personal messages make a big impact on decision makers. Please add a note about why this issue matters to you!

1000 characters remaining

I’m your constituent, and I’m frustrated by what I’m hearing about the legislature’s supposed attempts to make our power bills more affordable. This new bill, S730, doesn’t protect rate payers - at least not Section 10, which will delay the retirement of coal plants until new nuclear power is approved by the Utilities Commission. How long will that take? Every year we’re relying on coal, we’re overpaying for power. Coal plants are more expensive to run than renewables like solar and battery - which are cheaper and faster to build, too! And once they start building, there’s nothing to stop Duke from passing their construction costs along to consumers - because last year, the legislature passed the misleadingly named “Power Bill Reduction Act” (S.266) allowing Duke to make us pay for construction work in progress - even if the technology is unproven and never delivers power to the grid. That’s not rate payer protections - it’s just a guarantee that Duke will continue to pull down huge profits while everyday people struggle to pay their exorbitant power bills. If this new bill S.730 is really about protecting rate payers, it shouldn’t have Section 10 at all. Section 10 is bad for me, bad for you, and bad for every rate payer in our district. Please drop it from this bill.

4000 characters remaining

By taking this action to protect the planet, you are affirming you want to receive regular Sierra Club communications and may vote on policy designated by the Sierra Club Board. Terms and Conditions & Privacy Policy

Privacy Policy Your Privacy Choices Cookie Policy Terms & Conditions

Sierra Club® and "Explore, enjoy and protect the planet"® are registered trademarks of the Sierra Club. ©Sierra Club 2026. The Sierra Club Seal is a registered copyright, service mark, and trademark of the Sierra Club.