The final versions of the House and Senate’s sweeping energy affordability bill are now out and heading to the last few stages of the legislative process. The first stop is the conference committee, where three reps and three senators will reconcile the two versions of the bills. While they have some similarities, these two versions have some major differences, and we need to let our legislators know that in the final bill we want:
- No budget cuts to Mass Save and ACP funding: The House version cuts $1 billion dollars from Mass Save and diverts 70% of ACP funding away from crucial programs. The Senate version does not have this same budget cut.
- Saving ratepayers money through utility accountability: The Senate version phases out GSEP by 2030, saving ratepayers $1.46 billion and prohibits utilities from using ratepayer money for lobbying expenses. The House version does not have these same provisions.
- Stronger data center protections: Both the House and Senate have some data center specific regulations. We want these combined for widespread protections from the energy, noise, water, and energy bill impacts the data centers bring.
- Maintain the public’s right to vote on new nuclear facilities: The House repealed the 1982 law that required new nuclear facilities to be approved through a statewide ballot initiative. The Senate bill does not include this repeal.
Will you contact your legislator to ask them to advocate for a final bill that protects Massachusetts residents from utility profiteering and data center development, and prioritizes clean energy, energy efficiency, and equity?